“...that they may
encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their
children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject
to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be dishonored.”
- Titus 2:4+5
This exhortation to
young women cannot be neglected; it is clear in the text, but it is
not culturally acceptable today, and as such it is easy to let it go
unmentioned. Sinful man is very concerned with self-definition,
self-realization, and unbridled autonomy. But God is in the business
of bridling His creation; He both creates and defines what He has
created. Truly, He is the most qualified to do the defining, and it
is in keeping His commandments that our joy is made full. The
bridling of the horse unleashes its power. (John 15)
From my own limited
experience and observation, it seems that about ten years ago this
passage and its presentation of the homemaking woman was very much in
vogue in conservative Christian circles; honestly, it was perhaps
presented a little too unilaterally, without enough room for
Christian liberty and variety in application. A home business was the
only option for a single young woman who wanted to be financially
productive. For a girl to consider a college education was heresy-
maybe not punishable by the tribunal, but certainly deserving of
concerned condescension. Christian womanhood was supposed to look the
same way for everyone. But that never happens, and it isn’t
supposed to. The tapestry of the Church is a varicolored tunic, not a
straightjacket.
Now, however, we
seem to have taken a ride on the pendulum; now, we not only embrace
Christian liberty and variety, but we practically disembowel the
Scriptural commands in the process. We have rejected straightjacket
and varicolored tunic alike, and we are running through the streets
baring our liberty for all to see. Now this passage really means
nothing- yes, we accept it as Scripture, and we make a nod to some
vague idea about the wife being the homemaker. But Titus 2 doesn’t
really have much bearing on whether or not my wife should get a job,
or whether or not our girls should learn old-fashioned homemaking
tasks. Perhaps most damaging of all is the strong perception that
keeping the home and raising the kids is a second-level calling, as
if the passionate pursuit of this essential mission reduces a woman
to being too easily satisfied. As if “stay at home mom” was
equivalent to “the help.”
This passage does
mean something, and we cannot shy away from it; we must let God
speak. God has called women to a different role than men, and for a
woman to set that calling aside is for her to take a step down, not a
step up. God does call women to be home-centered (and He does call
them to be subject to their husbands, since we’re already stepping
on toes here). It is straightforward in the text. It isn’t for me
or anyone else to define for everyone exactly what those two things
mean in practice. But the point is that they mean something. The
application of the principle will vary, but there must be an
application.
We cannot be ashamed
of the Word of God. His commands are good, and they bring life and
joy.
If we do not embrace
this facet of God’s design for His people, then we will give
occasion for the Word of God to be dishonored.


